Penal Codes

Updated October 1, 2026. By Gabriel R. McGuire.

Quick answer

California Penal Code 422 makes certain threats of death or great bodily injury a crime. The prosecution must prove more than an angry statement: the person must intend the statement to be understood as a threat, the words and circumstances must communicate a serious and immediate prospect of execution, and the recipient must actually experience reasonable, sustained fear. The person making the threat does not have to intend to carry it out. The Judicial Council's CALCRIM 1300 instruction explains these requirements.

PC 422 can be prosecuted as a misdemeanor or felony. Bail depends on the current charges, county schedule, warrant or court order and any other custody restrictions. If a loved one is arrested, Bail Hotline's dedicated posting team can help with the bond process and walk a cosigner through the agreement. The court decides release conditions and the criminal case.

Criminal threats at a glance

In this guide: What must be proved | Texts and context | Attempted threats | Other offenses | Penalties | Bail | Family steps | Protective orders | Bail Hotline help | FAQ

What must be proved under PC 422

The legal requirements work together. A booking label or a troubling screenshot does not establish every element of a criminal conviction. CALCRIM 1300, revised in February 2026, separates the proof into six parts. Each has a practical purpose when a lawyer examines the accusation.

A willful threat of death or great bodily injury

The alleged threat must concern unlawfully killing someone or causing great bodily injury. The jury instruction describes great bodily injury as significant or substantial physical injury beyond moderate harm. A statement about embarrassment, an economic dispute or damage to property does not become a PC 422 threat simply because it is upsetting. Another law may still apply to the conduct.

Willful conduct means conduct done willingly or on purpose. That requirement is different from a need to prove that the speaker understood the Penal Code or intended every later consequence. A lawyer will examine what was actually communicated and the evidence supporting its meaning.

An oral, written or electronic communication

PC 422 covers statements made verbally, in writing or through an electronic communication device. A conversation, letter, text, email or electronic recording may therefore supply evidence. The legal question remains whether the communication satisfies the full offense.

The form of the communication matters. The authorities collected in CALCRIM 1300 distinguish verbal statements from threatening hand gestures alone. Physical conduct can help explain words and can violate other laws, but a family should not assume every alarming gesture automatically establishes this particular charge.

Intent that the statement be understood as a threat

The prosecution must prove the required intent about the communication. Intending that a statement be taken as a threat is different from intending to perform the threatened act. Saying that the speaker would never actually have acted does not, by itself, answer the PC 422 question.

Communications through another person require attention to whether the alleged speaker intended the threat to reach the recipient. A private remark and a deliberately relayed threat do not present identical facts. Counsel needs the full communication history, including who received the statement and how it reached the person allegedly threatened.

Sufficient seriousness and immediacy in context

The jury evaluates the words alongside their surrounding circumstances. The communication must convey a serious intention and the immediate prospect that the threat will be carried out. Relevant context can include the relationship, the setting, earlier interactions and conduct surrounding the statement.

A condition in a sentence does not automatically prevent a criminal-threat conviction. CALCRIM 1300's commentary, discussing People v. Bolin, explains that a conditional threat can still convey the required gravity and immediate prospect. The instruction also states that an immediate ability to carry out the threat is not required. Families should avoid treating one word or the speaker's physical distance as a complete legal answer.

Actual sustained fear

For the completed offense, the threat must actually cause sustained fear for the recipient's safety or the safety of the recipient's immediate family. CALCRIM 1300 distinguishes sustained fear from fear that is merely momentary or fleeting. It does not provide a universal stopwatch rule that resolves every case.

The statute's family definition also extends beyond children and spouses. It includes specified relatives and people who regularly live in the household, as well as people who regularly lived there within the preceding six months. The relationship and living arrangements can therefore matter when the alleged fear concerns another person.

Fear that was reasonable under the circumstances

Actual fear and reasonable fear are separate questions. The prosecution must prove both for the completed offense. The recipient's reaction matters, and so do the circumstances explaining that reaction. The same isolated words can have a different significance when the surrounding facts differ.

This is why a defense review usually reaches beyond a single quoted line. A lawyer can evaluate the complete conversation, accounts from witnesses, records of earlier events and evidence of what happened afterward. Families can help organize existing information without contacting or pressuring the person who reported the threat.

Texts, online posts and the surrounding circumstances

Electronic communication does not lower the proof requirements. A message that looks threatening still requires examination of intent, meaning, context and fear. The current PC 422 expressly includes electronic devices. The communication medium does not decide the case by itself.

For a family trying to help counsel, keeping the complete existing thread is usually more useful than selecting the most favorable line. Note the sender and recipient identifiers, dates, times and where the original material is stored. Keep available surrounding messages with the relevant statement. Do not edit an image so that the original context disappears, delete records or use another person's account without permission.

An online audience can complicate the factual questions. A public post, a direct message and a communication passed along by a third person can reach their recipients in different ways. The attorney needs to examine who the communication concerned, whether it was conveyed to that person and what the accused intended. A screenshot alone may leave those questions unanswered.

The Supreme Court's decision in In re George T. illustrates why context matters. As explained in CALCRIM 1300's related-issues discussion, the court found a student's poem insufficiently clear and immediate, considering the surrounding circumstances, to establish the criminal threat at issue. That decision does not make every poem, joke or online post immune from prosecution. It shows why the required proof cannot be replaced by the fact that a statement disturbed someone.

Constitutional speech questions can require a lawyer's careful analysis. Families should preserve the evidence and leave legal conclusions to counsel. An arrest is an allegation, and the prosecution's burden at trial remains separate from the decisions made during booking and release.

What if the recipient was not in sustained fear?

A failure to prove actual sustained fear can matter greatly to a completed PC 422 charge. It does not establish that every possible threat-related charge must fail. In People v. Toledo (2001), the California Supreme Court recognized attempted criminal threats and affirmed the attempted-threat conviction before it.

The decision discussed situations in which someone acts with the required intent and makes a legally sufficient threat, but a circumstance prevents completion. One example concerns a recipient who understands the threat but does not actually experience sustained fear, although the circumstances reasonably could have produced that fear. The intent and other required facts still matter. The decision does not turn every offensive statement into an attempt.

For a family, the useful question is the exact filed allegation: completed PC 422, an attempt or another offense. A jail record may be abbreviated, and a prosecutor's later filing may differ from the arrest label. Give counsel the available booking and court documents rather than assuming that one missing element resolves the entire case.

PC 422 and other threat-related offenses

Several California laws address conduct that may be described casually as a threat. They have different elements and penalties. The exact section number on the booking record or complaint matters.

These provisions are not a list of additional definitions inside PC 422. An accusation may involve more than one law, but each charge requires its own analysis. A false-bomb allegation, for example, should not be assigned the sentence for PC 422 merely because both situations involve fear.

Likewise, repeated following, harassment, a protective-order violation or alleged interference with a witness can present separate legal questions. This guide focuses on criminal threats under PC 422. Ask the attorney which sections and subdivisions are actually charged and which release restrictions apply to the complete case.

Misdemeanor and felony penalties

PC 422 provides alternate misdemeanor and felony punishment, often described as a wobbler. The basic adult sentencing exposure depends on how the offense is prosecuted and resolved. A booking code does not tell a family what sentence a court will eventually impose.

The misdemeanor language in PC 422(a) refers to a county-jail term not exceeding one year. PC 18.5(a) makes the applicable maximum 364 days. That qualification concerns the covered one-year county-jail maximum; it is not a cap on every possible county-jail sentence or a combined sentence for multiple offenses.

For a felony PC 422 conviction, the ordinary prison terms are 16 months, two years or three years, under the state-prison provision and the general felony terms in PC 18(a). These are basic terms. Other charges, proven enhancements and criminal history can change the total exposure. They should not be presented as a guarantee that the entire case ends within three years.

The serious-felony classification deserves attention. PC 1192.7(c)(38) includes felony criminal threats under PC 422. A lawyer should explain the consequences of that classification and any prior-conviction allegations before a person makes decisions about a plea. The classification does not mean that an arrest itself establishes a felony conviction.

The current statute also permits the court, when sentencing a person convicted of a felony violation of PC 422(a), to consider an aggravating factor if the defendant willfully threatened death or great bodily injury to someone the defendant knew was a covered state constitutional officer, Member of the Legislature, judge or court commissioner. That provision took effect January 1, 2026. Its specific requirements matter; it does not replace the underlying PC 422 elements or apply automatically whenever an official is involved.

Keep bail and punishment separate. Bail concerns release during the case. Posting a bond does not buy a particular sentence, establish innocence or resolve the accusation. The criminal defense attorney handles the merits, potential penalties and available legal options.

Bail after a criminal-threats arrest

There is no single California bail amount for PC 422. Under PC 1269b, county judges prepare and annually revise countywide schedules. Before a court appearance, a warrant or applicable schedule can supply the amount. After the defendant appears on the charge, the judge's bail order controls.

Families should confirm the current booking rather than rely on an old online dollar figure. Ask for the exact charges, whether they are recorded as misdemeanor or felony, the current bail amount, whether bail can presently be accepted and whether other holds or cases affect release. Information from the first arrest may change as the case progresses.

Special hearing rules for felony PC 422

PC 1270.1 includes felony PC 422. Subject to its stated exception, it requires an open-court hearing before release on one's own recognizance or on bail at an amount above or below the schedule. The section also provides notice and an opportunity for the prosecution and defense to be heard.

That rule should not be paraphrased as a universal requirement that every scheduled bond await this hearing. Its trigger concerns the specified release decisions. The statute separately allows a qualifying increase through the procedure described in subdivision (e). Counsel and the custody agency can clarify what has actually occurred in the particular booking.

At the hearing, the court considers matters including prior court appearances, potential sentence, danger to other people, community ties and ability to post bond. Families can help counsel gather accurate information. A stable address or a history of attending court may be relevant, but no single fact guarantees release or a reduction.

Safety and the court's decision

PC 1275 identifies public safety as the primary consideration in setting, reducing or denying bail. Alleged threats to a victim or witness are among the matters the court considers. Serious-felony reductions also have specific statutory requirements.

For the family, this makes a realistic release plan useful. Counsel needs accurate information about where the defendant would stay and how court orders would be followed. If the proposed home is shared with a protected person, identify that issue before treating the address as settled.

A bond on this charge does not resolve an unrelated hold, another warrant or every other reason for custody. Ask which restrictions remain. For the paperwork side, the separate California bail-bond checklist explains information a family can organize. For questions about the court's release ruling, speak with defense counsel.

What families can do after an arrest

The most helpful tasks are concrete and verifiable. Families do not need to decide whether the accusation is legally sufficient before beginning to organize the necessary information.

1. Confirm custody. Record the person's full name, booking number if available and the agency currently holding them. Confirm where they are now rather than assuming the arrest location is the receiving jail.
2. Read the complete charge information. Keep the section numbers, subdivisions and any available warrant or court paperwork. Ask whether the bail information is current and whether the case is awaiting a court decision.
3. Arrange criminal defense help. Counsel can address the allegation, the evidence, a release hearing and conditions of release. The official California Courts arraignment guide explains the first appearance and the role of appointed counsel when a defendant qualifies.
4. Preserve existing evidence for counsel. Keep complete messages and records in their original form where possible. Make a factual timeline that separates what you personally witnessed from what someone told you. Do not publish accusations, solicit a changed account or contact a protected person on the defendant's behalf.
5. Obtain every applicable order. Identify protected people, prohibited contact, any stay-away requirements and the next court date. Give counsel the actual documents if different orders appear to conflict.
6. Plan the practical details. Discuss a lawful address, transportation and reminders for required court appearances. A release plan must fit the court's orders. Family willingness to help does not authorize contact that an order forbids.
7. Understand the bond agreement before signing. Ask the bail agent to explain the written obligations and your questions. The defendant's court duties and the cosigner's agreement deserve careful attention even when the family feels pressure to move quickly.

If you are the person who has been threatened and face an immediate emergency, call 911. For ongoing safety concerns, law enforcement, a lawyer or the court's assistance resources can help identify appropriate reporting and protective-order options. A family arranging a bond should never pressure someone to withdraw a report as a condition of helping the defendant.

Release planning and protective orders

Criminal-threat allegations can involve partners, relatives, neighbors or people with no household relationship. Release planning must address the actual case. Do not assume that every PC 422 booking is domestic violence, or that the absence of a domestic relationship eliminates the possibility of a protective order.

PC 136.2 authorizes protective orders under its specified circumstances when harm, intimidation or dissuasion of a victim or witness has occurred or is reasonably likely. The California Courts arraignment guide explains that a judge may issue a criminal protective order and that the defendant receives a copy at arraignment if one is issued.

Read the actual contact restriction

The signed order matters more than a family's summary of it. Some provisions prohibit communication; others allow particular limited contact. If a no-contact provision applies, do not use a relative as a messenger to do what the defendant cannot do directly. Questions about an exception or an unclear term belong with the attorney and the court.

An invitation, apology or request to reconcile is not itself a court modification. Posting bail does not cancel the order either. A family should not arrange a meeting on the assumption that everyone agreeing privately makes it permissible. Obtain clarification about the actual order before planning contact.

Check housing, children and belongings

A shared home can make a release plan more complicated. Discuss an appropriate address with counsel before promising that the defendant will return there. If the order affects access to children, a vehicle, work or necessary belongings, tell the lawyer what needs to be resolved. Do not improvise a pickup or exchange that conflicts with the order.

The same care applies to multiple orders. A criminal order and a family-court order can have different purposes and terms. PC 136.2 addresses coordination and enforcement priority in specified situations. Families should supply both documents to counsel and seek a lawful arrangement rather than choosing whichever order seems more convenient.

Prepare for the next court appearance

Release is one stage of the case. The official arraignment guide explains that later dates depend on the charge and the plea, with misdemeanor and felony cases following different paths. Confirm the date, courthouse, department and whether the defendant must attend in person. Keep the written notice and contact counsel if instructions are unclear.

Court-date reminders support preparation, but the defendant still needs to follow the court's requirements. A changed phone number, a move or a transportation problem should be addressed promptly. Neither a family member nor a bail agent can simply excuse an appearance that the court requires.

How Bail Hotline Can Help

Everything above is intended to help families understand the charge and release process. Here is how our team can help with the bond side of a criminal-threats arrest.

Bail Hotline is family-owned and has served families since 2004. We operate through DMCG, Inc., California Department of Insurance license 1845394. Call (888) 958-1228, available 24/7.

A clear bond plan while the family gets organized

Our dedicated 24/7 posting agents help families with the bond process. Start with the defendant's identifying information, current custody location and available booking details. Explain if the case involves another county or if the family is still clarifying an order or hold. A large, complicated or out-of-county bond is not an automatic no; the circumstances receive individual consideration.

Every cosigner is walked through the agreement. Bring your questions about the written responsibilities before signing, and explain what information you still need. Our team also provides text court-date reminders to help clients prepare for appearances. The court and defense attorney remain the sources for the defendant's legal appearance requirements.

If a warrant or missed appearance becomes an issue, ask our team about the appropriate warrant walkthrough and tell defense counsel promptly. Every case is different, the judge makes the final decision and we cannot promise a result. Willful conduct is treated differently from an honest mistake; no release, reinstatement or dismissal is automatic.

Contact an active California office

These direct office links offer practical starting points across California. Identify the county handling the case when you contact the team.

Use the locations directory for additional offices and the bail FAQ for common bond questions. Tell the team about the actual booking and court order so the discussion stays focused on the family's situation.

Frequently asked questions

Can criminal threats be charged as a misdemeanor?

Yes. PC 422 provides misdemeanor and felony punishment. The applicable misdemeanor county-jail maximum is 364 days under PC 18.5. Ask counsel about the charge actually filed and the potential consequences in the complete case.

Can a single text message qualify under PC 422?

Potentially, yes. The law covers written and electronic communication and does not require a series of messages for this offense. The prosecution still must prove the required intent, the seriousness and immediacy of the threat, and reasonable sustained fear. Preserve the surrounding conversation for counsel.

Is it a defense that the person never intended to act?

An intention to carry out the threatened act is not required under PC 422. The required intent concerns whether the statement was meant to be understood as a threat. That distinction does not eliminate the prosecution's obligation to prove all the other elements.

Does a conditional statement automatically avoid the charge?

No. The words and circumstances must be evaluated together. CALCRIM 1300 explains that a conditional threat can still satisfy the law when it conveys the required seriousness and immediate prospect of execution. An attorney can assess the actual communication.

What if the recipient says they were never afraid?

Actual sustained fear is required for the completed offense, and the fear must be reasonable. An attempted-criminal-threat allegation may present a different question, as People v. Toledo explains. Counsel should review the evidence and exact charges rather than assume the entire case ends on that statement alone.

What is the bail amount for felony criminal threats?

There is no universal statewide amount. Confirm the current county schedule, warrant or judge's order and any other custody restrictions. PC 1270.1 provides special hearing requirements for the specified decisions about changing scheduled bail or releasing someone on their own recognizance.

Can the family cancel a criminal protective order?

The family cannot cancel a court order by agreeing privately. Read the exact terms and ask the attorney about obtaining a court modification when appropriate. Release on bail does not authorize contact that the order prohibits.

Does posting bail resolve the criminal-threats case?

No. Bail concerns release during the case, while the court proceedings address the allegation and possible penalties. The defendant must comply with release conditions and required appearances. A criminal defense lawyer handles the case, and a bail agent handles the bond process.

Why We Publish This

Families facing a criminal-threats arrest need accurate information about the charge, the release process and the court's orders. This guide provides general California information, checked against the sources below on October 1, 2026. It is not legal advice for an individual case. Ask a criminal defense attorney to apply the law to the actual allegations and documents.

Sources and Further Reading

• California Penal Code 422: current criminal-threats statute, including the amendment effective January 1, 2026.
• Judicial Council, 2026 CALCRIM, instruction 1300: elements, definitions and related authorities, printed pages 1025 through 1029.
• PC 18.5, PC 18 and PC 1192.7: custody terms and serious-felony classification.
• PC 1269b, PC 1270.1 and PC 1275: bail schedules, specified hearings and safety considerations.
• PC 136.2 and California Courts, The arraignment: protective orders and early court proceedings.
• People v. Toledo, 26 Cal.4th 221 (2001), published opinion: attempted criminal threats.
• PC 148.1, PC 11418.1 and PC 422.4: separate offenses distinguished from PC 422.

Quick answer: In California, arson means willfully and maliciously setting fire to, burning, or causing the burning of a structure, forest land or property, or helping someone else do it. It is defined in Penal Code 451. Every conviction under PC 451 is a felony. The prison range depends on what burned and who was hurt: 16 months, two or three years for arson of property; two, four or six years for a structure or forest land; three, five or eight years for an inhabited home or inhabited property; and five, seven or nine years when the fire causes great bodily injury. Aggravated arson under PC 451.5 carries 10 years to life. A fire started recklessly rather than deliberately is usually charged instead as “unlawfully causing a fire” under PC 452, which can be a felony or a misdemeanor. An adult convicted of arson or attempted arson must register as an arson offender for the rest of their life, and arson is on California’s serious felony list, so a conviction counts as a strike. For release, the 2026 felony bail schedules of the Los Angeles, Orange and Santa Clara County superior courts list $25,000 to $500,000 for most arson charges, and a judge must hold a hearing in open court before releasing someone arrested for a serious or violent felony on their own recognizance or at an amount different from the schedule.

Updated September 2026. Written for people facing an arson or fire-related charge in California, and for the family members trying to help them. Checked on September 28, 2026 against the California Penal Code and Constitution, California Supreme Court decisions, the 2026 edition of California’s criminal jury instructions, the 2026 felony bail schedules of the Los Angeles, Orange and Santa Clara County superior courts, and the California Department of Justice’s Crime in California 2025 report. General information, not legal advice.

This guide explains what arson means under California law, how it differs from a reckless or careless fire, what a conviction can bring, and how release works after an arrest. For bail schedule amounts across many other charges, see our guide to bail amounts by crime in California. If someone was just arrested and you do not know where they are being held, start with how to find out if someone is in jail.

Arson in California at a Glance

In this guide: What counts as arson | Arson or reckless fire? | Penalties | Strikes and registration | After an arrest | Bail amounts | Federal cases | Examples | By the numbers | Checklist | How Bail Hotline can help | FAQ | Sources

What Counts as Arson Under Penal Code 451

Penal Code 451 says a person is guilty of arson when he or she “willfully and maliciously sets fire to or burns or causes to be burned or who aids, counsels, or procures the burning of, any structure, forest land, or property.” That sentence has three parts, and prosecutors must prove each one: an act of burning, a mental state, and something that burned.

The act. Setting a fire yourself is the obvious case, but the statute also covers causing something to be burned and anyone who “aids, counsels, or procures the burning.” A person who pays, persuades or helps someone else to set a fire can be charged with arson even if they never touched a match.

How much has to burn. Very little. California’s criminal jury instruction for arson, CALCRIM No. 1515 (2026 edition), tells jurors: “To set fire to or burn means to damage or destroy with fire either all or part of something, no matter how small the part.” A building does not have to burn down for the charge to apply.

What burned. Penal Code 450 defines the targets, and the category drives the sentence:

• A structure is “any building, or commercial or public tent, bridge, tunnel, or powerplant.”
• Forest land is “any brush covered land, cut-over land, forest, grasslands, or woods.” That is why a grass or brush fire can be charged the same way as a fire in a building.
• Property means “real property or personal property, other than a structure or forest land.” The state’s arson statistics, for example, count fires involving motor vehicles and “other property” such as crops, timber and fences separately from structures.
• Inhabited means “currently being used for dwelling purposes whether occupied or not.” A home is inhabited even if no one is inside when it burns. The definition adds that an inhabited structure does not include the land it sits on.

Burning your own things. PC 451(d) contains a narrow exception. Arson of property “does not include one burning or causing to be burned his or her own personal property unless there is an intent to defraud or there is injury to another person or another person’s structure, forest land, or property.” The exception applies only to a person’s own personal property. It does not mention structures or forest land. It also disappears if the goal was to defraud someone, such as an insurer, or if the fire hurts another person or damages someone else’s property.

Arson or Unlawfully Causing a Fire? Intent Is the Dividing Line

The biggest question in many fire cases is not whether the person started the fire. It is what was in their mind when they did. California law separates deliberate fires, reckless fires and careless fires, and each one leads to a different charge.

Willfully and maliciously. Penal Code 450(e) says “maliciously” imports “a wish to vex, defraud, annoy, or injure another person, or an intent to do a wrongful act.” In People v. Atkins (decided March 12, 2001), the California Supreme Court explained that these words ensure “the setting of the fire must be a deliberate and intentional act, as distinguished from an accidental or unintentional ignition or act of setting a fire.” The court also held that arson is a general intent crime. Prosecutors do not have to prove the person specifically meant to burn the particular building or hillside. For the same reason, the court ruled that evidence of voluntary intoxication is not admissible to argue the person lacked the mental state for arson: “We conclude that such evidence is not admissible because arson is a general intent crime.”

Recklessly. Penal Code 452 makes a person guilty of unlawfully causing a fire “when they recklessly set fire to, burn, or cause to be burned any structure, forest land, or property.” Under Penal Code 450(f), reckless means the person “is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk” that the act will start a fire, and the disregard must be “a gross deviation” from how a reasonable person would act. Being drunk does not help here either: the same definition says a person who is unaware of the risk “solely by reason of voluntary intoxication also acts recklessly.”

Careless or negligent. Some fires are neither deliberate nor reckless. Health and Safety Code 13001 makes it a misdemeanor to carelessly or negligently throw “any lighted cigarette, cigar, ashes, or other flaming or glowing substance” where it may start a fire, or to run a welding torch or similar device without clearing flammable material or taking reasonable precautions. Separately, Public Resources Code 4421 says a person may not set fire to “a forest, brush, or other flammable material” on land that is not theirs or under their legal control without permission.

The line between these levels is not always obvious, and the Supreme Court itself split on where it falls in the firecracker case described below. How a charge is filed, and whether it can be reduced, often turns on facts only a defense lawyer can fully assess.

Penalties for Arson in California

California uses three possible terms, a lower, middle and upper term, for most felonies, and the judge chooses among them under the state’s sentencing rules. The basic ranges for arson are in the table at the top of this guide. Several other rules can raise the stakes considerably.

Aggravated arson (PC 451.5)

Penal Code 451.5 is the most serious arson charge. It requires more than malice: the person must act “willfully, maliciously, deliberately, with premeditation,” and with intent to injure people, to damage property under circumstances likely to injure people, or to damage one or more structures or inhabited dwellings. At least one aggravating factor must also be true. Under the version in effect since January 1, 2026:

• The person was previously convicted of arson within the past 10 years.
• The fire caused property damage and other losses over $10,100,000, not counting damage to inhabited dwellings. The court considers the cost of fire suppression in that total.
• The fire damaged or destroyed five or more inhabited dwellings.

The punishment is 10 years to life in state prison, and the person is not eligible for parole until 10 calendar years have passed. The current version is set to expire on January 1, 2029. A version already on the books takes effect that day and keeps only the prior-conviction and five-dwellings factors.

Arson during a state of emergency (PC 454)

Penal Code 454 applies when someone violates PC 451 or 452 “during and within an area of” a state of emergency or state of insurrection proclaimed by the Governor. Arson under 451(a), (b) or (c) then carries five, seven or nine years. Everyone else covered by the section faces three, five or seven years. Probation is not allowed “except in unusual cases where the interest of justice would best be served.” Because emergency proclamations are common during wildfire events, families should check whether PC 454 appears on the booking record or complaint.

Enhancements (PC 451.1 and 452.1)

Penal Code 451.1 adds three, four or five years to a felony arson sentence if any of these is found true:

• A prior felony conviction under PC 451 or 452.
• A firefighter, peace officer or other emergency worker suffered great bodily injury.
• The fire caused great bodily injury to more than one victim.
• The fire caused multiple structures to burn.
• For arson under 451(a), (b) or (c), the fire was caused by “a device designed to accelerate the fire or delay ignition.”

Penal Code 452.1 adds one, two or three years to a felony PC 452 sentence “for each” of the first four circumstances. Under both sections, the facts must be alleged in the charging document and either admitted in open court or found true by the judge or jury.

Fines, probation limits and other sentencing rules

• Fines. Penal Code 456 lets the court add a fine of up to $50,000 for any felony in the arson chapter. When the crime was committed “for pecuniary gain,” the court may instead impose a fine of twice the anticipated or actual gross gain.
• Evaluation. Under Penal Code 457, the court may order a psychiatric or psychological examination for sentencing.
• Probation limits. Penal Code 1203(e)(9) bars probation, except in unusual cases, for a person who intentionally inflicted great bodily injury in an arson under 451(a) or intentionally burned an inhabited structure or property under 451(b).
• Fires set in custody. Under PC 451(e) and 452(e), a sentence for a fire set while the person was serving time in a prison, prison camp or county jail must run consecutively to the sentence they were already serving.
• Organized retail theft. Since January 1, 2025, PC 452(f) makes it an aggravating factor at sentencing when an unlawfully caused fire was carried out in a merchant’s premises to facilitate organized retail theft.

Attempted arson and incendiary materials (PC 455 and PC 453)

A fire does not have to start for a charge to follow. Penal Code 455 punishes a willful and malicious attempt to burn, or “any act preliminary thereto, or in furtherance thereof,” with 16 months, two or three years. It adds that placing flammable, explosive or combustible material or a device in or around a structure, forest land or property, intending to burn it later, counts as an attempt.

Penal Code 453 covers possessing, manufacturing or disposing of flammable material or an incendiary device “with intent to willfully and maliciously” use it to burn something. It excludes commercially made lighting devices and lawful uses, such as authorized law enforcement, scientific research and permitted brush disposal.

Strikes, Lifetime Registration and Other Consequences

The prison term is only part of what an arson conviction can bring. Several consequences follow a person long after the case ends.

Arson is a strike

“Arson” is listed as a serious felony in Penal Code 1192.7(c)(14), and an attempt to commit a listed serious felony is itself on the list under (c)(39). Arson under 451(a) or (b) is also a violent felony under Penal Code 667.5(c)(10). Under Penal Code 667, California’s Three Strikes law, a serious or violent felony conviction becomes a strike prior. If a person with one strike prior that has been pled and proved is convicted of a new felony, the term is doubled. Two or more strike priors can lead to a life term, subject to exceptions in the law. Separately, a person convicted of a new serious felony faces a five-year enhancement for each prior serious felony conviction brought and tried separately.

The same serious and violent labels also shape what happens right after an arrest, as explained in the release section.

Lifetime arson registration (PC 457.1)

Penal Code 457.1 requires anyone convicted in a California court of arson or attempted arson on or after November 30, 1994, to register “for the rest of their life.” For this purpose, “arson” means a violation of PC 451, 451.5 or 453, plus attempted arson including PC 455. Unlawfully causing a fire under PC 452 is not on that list.

• Where and when. The person registers with the police chief of the city where they live, or the sheriff if they live in an unincorporated area or a city without a police department, plus campus police if they live on a University of California, California State University or community college campus. Registration is due within 14 days of moving into or changing residence in a city, county or campus. A person without a residence registers where they are located.
• Moving. A change of address must be reported in writing within 10 days to the agency where the person last registered.
• Penalty for not registering. A violation is a misdemeanor. A willful violation by someone convicted of arson or attempted arson carries at least 90 days and up to one year in county jail, plus at least one year of probation. A person on parole or probation who fails to register on time has that parole or probation revoked.
• Privacy. The registration statements, photographs and fingerprints are not open to public inspection. They are available to peace officers and other law enforcement officers.
• Young people. The statute sets a separate rule for some juvenile court cases, with registration ending at age 25 or when the juvenile record is sealed, whichever comes first.
• Ending registration. A person may be relieved of the duty by obtaining a certificate of rehabilitation. Someone required to register because of a misdemeanor conviction is relieved if granted relief under Penal Code 1203.4.

Restitution, damages and firefighting costs

Under Penal Code 1202.4(f), whenever a victim has suffered economic loss from the defendant’s conduct, the court “shall require that the defendant make restitution” and “shall order full restitution.” Civil law adds more. Health and Safety Code 13007 makes a person who sets or allows a fire “wilfully, negligently, or in violation of law” liable to property owners for fire damage. Health and Safety Code 13009 makes a person who negligently or unlawfully sets a fire, or lets one escape, liable “for the fire suppression costs incurred in fighting the fire and for the cost of providing rescue or emergency medical services.” Those costs become a debt the agencies can collect.

Immigration consequences and ICE holds

For a person who is not a U.S. citizen, a plea or conviction can carry immigration consequences. Penal Code 1016.3 requires defense counsel to give “accurate and affirmative advice about the immigration consequences of a proposed disposition,” so raise it with the lawyer early.

Arson can weigh heavily in an immigration case. The federal list of “aggravated felonies” in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43) includes “an offense described in” several subsections of the federal arson and explosives statute, 18 U.S.C. 844, among them 844(i), and the list applies to state convictions as well as federal ones. In Luna Torres v. Lynch (May 19, 2016), a case about a New York arson conviction, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a state offense counts when it has every element of a listed federal crime except one requiring a connection to interstate or foreign commerce. A noncitizen convicted of an aggravated felony after admission is deportable under 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), and 8 U.S.C. 1226(c) generally requires immigration authorities to detain people deportable on that ground, with release allowed only in narrow witness-protection cases. Whether a particular California arson conviction fits is a technical question for an immigration lawyer.

ICE can also come up while the person is still in county jail. Under the California Values Act, a local agency may not keep someone in custody on the basis of an ICE hold request (Government Code 7284.6). It may notify ICE of a nonpublic release date, or transfer the person to ICE, only in the situations listed in Government Code 7282.5, or, for a transfer, with a judicial warrant or judicial probable cause determination. For someone with a past conviction, those situations include a conviction for a serious or violent felony, which covers arson, a felony conviction punishable by state prison, and being a current registrant on the California Sex and Arson Registry. For someone newly charged with arson, a separate subdivision allows a release-date notification, but not a transfer, once a magistrate finds probable cause on that charge, because arson is a serious felony. These are permissions, not requirements, and county practices differ. Our guide to immigration bonds and bail bonds explains ICE holds, immigration bonds, who cannot get an immigration bond, and what to do if ICE detains someone who is out on bail.

What Happens After an Arson Arrest

Fire cases are often investigated by fire agencies as well as police. Designated employees of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) are peace officers under Penal Code 830.2(g), and federal agencies can become involved when federal law applies. An arrest can happen at the scene or later, after investigators determine how the fire started.

Booking and the bail schedule. After booking, bail usually starts from the county’s schedule. Under Penal Code 1269b(c), the superior court judges in each county must “prepare, adopt, and annually revise” a uniform countywide bail schedule. The scheduled amount is a starting point, not a guarantee. Under Penal Code 1269c, after a warrantless arrest for a bailable felony, an officer who believes the scheduled bail is too low to ensure the person’s appearance can ask a magistrate, in a declaration under penalty of perjury, to set it higher. For more, see can a judge raise bail.

First court date. Under Penal Code 825, a person in custody must be taken before a magistrate “without unnecessary delay, and, in any event, within 48 hours after his or her arrest, excluding Sundays and holidays.” Our guide on how long it takes to see a judge explains the timing.

The serious and violent felony hearing rule. Because arson is a serious felony, Penal Code 1270.1 applies. Before a person arrested for a serious or violent felony can be released on bail in an amount “either more or less than the amount contained in the schedule,” or on their own recognizance, “a hearing shall be held in open court before the magistrate or judge.” The prosecutor and defense get two court days’ written notice. At that hearing, the court must consider past court appearances, the maximum possible sentence, danger to others, threats and past violence, and any evidence the person offers about community ties and ability to post bond. The judge must state the reasons on the record for any change from the schedule. Under the California Constitution’s article I, section 28(f)(3), victims receive notice of a bail hearing for a serious felony and a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

Lowering bail below the schedule. Under Penal Code 1275(c), before reducing bail below the scheduled amount for a serious or violent felony, the court must find “unusual circumstances” and state the facts on the record. The statute adds that unusual circumstances do not include the fact that the defendant made all prior court appearances or has not committed new offenses. In every bail decision, PC 1275(a) makes public safety “the primary consideration.”

Own-recognizance release. For violent felonies, which include arson under 451(a) and (b), Penal Code 1319 bars own-recognizance release until a hearing is held in open court with notice to the prosecutor. It also bars that release where there is clear and convincing evidence the person previously willfully failed to appear on a pending felony charge. Read more about release on your own recognizance.

Can bail be denied? Article I, section 12 of the California Constitution says a person “shall be released on bail by sufficient sureties” except in capital cases and two narrow felony situations that require clear and convincing evidence of a substantial likelihood of great bodily harm. In In re Kowalczyk (April 30, 2026), the California Supreme Court held that in noncapital cases, courts may deny bail only as to offenses covered by those subdivisions. When money bail is necessary, it must be set at an amount the person can reasonably attain. That builds on In re Humphrey (March 25, 2021), which held that courts may not detain someone solely because they cannot afford bail. Our guides to being denied bail and preparing for a bail hearing go deeper.

Los Angeles County. The Los Angeles Superior Court’s 2026 felony schedule uses a pre-arraignment release protocol for many lower-level offenses, but it states plainly: “Zero-dollar bail is not available for serious or violent crimes.” Under that protocol, people arrested for offenses listed in PC 1270.1 must post a financial condition of release or be held until arraignment or a hearing in open court. For how LA handles bail changes, see our guide to bail deviation in Los Angeles.

How Much Is Bail for Arson in California?

Each county sets its own schedule, and the amounts vary widely for the same charge. The table below shows the 2026 felony schedules of three large counties. These are scheduled starting points. A judge can set a different amount after the hearing described above, and an enhancement can add to the total.

Notes on reading the table:

• Orange County. The 2026 Orange County schedule lists only some fire charges. For offenses it does not list, it sets presumptive bail by the maximum state prison term for the offense plus any enhancement. That table starts at $20,000 for a three-year top term, rises with the term, and lists $1,000,000 for “All life sentences.”
• Santa Clara County. The 2026 Santa Clara County schedule lists aggravated arson as “No bail*.” Its instructions explain that for certain offenses carrying a possible life sentence, a judge “should, at arraignment, set bail an appropriate amount based on the sound discretion of the court, unless the judge determines that the defendant is not entitled to bail.” It also lists $100,000 for a PC 451.1 enhancement and $50,000 for a PC 452.1 enhancement.
• Los Angeles County. The 2026 Los Angeles County schedule flags each arson and unlawfully-causing-a-fire felony it lists as serious, violent or both, which matters for the hearing rules above.
• Other counties. Every county’s schedule is different and is revised each year. For the amounts in your county, check the superior court’s current schedule or call the jail, and see our wider guide to bail amounts by crime in California.

State or Federal? When Arson Becomes a Federal Case

Most arson cases in California are prosecuted in state court under the Penal Code. Federal prosecutors can bring their own charges when federal law applies. Under 18 U.S.C. 844, it is a federal crime to maliciously damage or destroy by fire or an explosive property owned by or leased to the United States, under 844(f)(1), or property “used in interstate or foreign commerce or in any activity affecting interstate or foreign commerce,” under 844(i). Each carries “not less than 5 years and not more than 20 years,” and 844(i) rises to 7 to 40 years if personal injury results. A federal case is heard in federal court, where release is decided under federal rules rather than a county bail schedule.

The best-known recent example is the Palisades Fire case, described in the examples section.

How Arson Cases Play Out: Three Real Cases and Three Hypothetical Examples

The real cases below come from court opinions, a federal case page and news reporting, with their actual outcomes as of September 2026. The hypothetical examples are invented to show how the rules in this guide fit together. They are not predictions for any real case.

The firecracker case: In re V.V. (2011)

On July 18, 2008, two 17-year-olds climbed a hill behind a residential street in Pasadena. According to the California Supreme Court’s opinion, one lit a large firecracker and the other threw it onto the brush-covered hillside. It exploded and caused a five-acre brush fire. The juvenile court found that they did not intend to set the hillside on fire, but still found the arson allegation true, dismissed the lesser charge of unlawfully causing a fire, declared them wards and placed them on home probation.

On June 6, 2011, the Supreme Court upheld the arson findings for both teens. The majority, written by Justice Chin, concluded that their acts “of intentionally igniting and throwing a firecracker amidst dry brush on a hillside, although done without intent to cause a fire or other harm, were sufficient to establish the requisite malice for arson.” Two justices dissented. Justice Kennard wrote that the teens were “guilty only of reckless firesetting (§ 452), which is a serious crime but not so serious as arson.” The lesson for families: a person does not have to intend to burn anything to face an arson charge, and reasonable judges can disagree about where arson ends and reckless burning begins.

The Holy Fire trial: charged, then acquitted of arson (2023)

The 2018 Holy Fire burned in Orange and Riverside counties. Prosecutors accused a Trabuco Canyon man, Forrest Gordon Clark, of setting it by burning his neighbor’s cabin. As ABC7 reported on June 2, 2023, an Orange County jury acquitted him of aggravated arson of five or more inhabited structures, arson of an inhabited structure, and arson of a structure or forest. It convicted him of felony criminal threats against the neighbor. His defense had presented experts who concluded the fire began along a roadway, not in the cabin. The judge sentenced him to two years, and he had credit for 3,520 days in custody awaiting trial, more than any possible punishment in the case. The lessons: an arson charge is an accusation, not a conviction, and where and how a fire started can become the central fight at trial. A long wait for trial can also mean years in custody.

The Palisades Fire: a federal case still pending

On October 15, 2025, a federal grand jury indicted Jonathan Rinderknecht on three counts: destruction of property by means of fire under 18 U.S.C. 844(f)(1), arson affecting property used in interstate commerce under 844(i), and timber set afire under 18 U.S.C. 1855. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office case page, the indictment alleges he maliciously started a fire near Pacific Palisades early on January 1, 2025, that developed into the Palisades Fire. NBC Los Angeles reported that thousands of structures were destroyed and 12 people died in that fire, and that he was not charged in connection with the deaths.

On June 26, 2026, a federal judge declared a mistrial after the jury could not reach verdicts. When polled, 10 jurors had found him not guilty and two guilty, according to NBC Los Angeles. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said, “We fully intend to retry this case before a new jury and obtain guilty verdicts on all charged counts.” Defense attorney Steven Haney responded, “Ten to 2 is an overwhelming message from the jury that the government failed.” In August 2026, prosecutors obtained a superseding indictment. According to NBC Los Angeles on August 19, 2026, it drops one of the three original counts and redefines the other two, separating the alleged arson of the first fire on January 1, 2025, known as the Lachman Fire, from the destruction caused by the Palisades Fire six days later. He pleaded not guilty to the revised indictment and remains in federal custody with no bail, NBC reported. The U.S. Attorney’s Office case page, updated August 21, 2026, lists the retrial for November 2, 2026. He is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

Hypothetical 1: A backyard burn pile that escapes

A homeowner burns old furniture in a backyard fire pit on a windy afternoon. Embers blow over the fence and scorch a neighbor’s shed. Burning your own personal property is not arson of property by itself under PC 451(d). But the exception disappears when the fire injures someone else’s structure or property, so the real question becomes the homeowner’s mental state. If prosecutors could show the homeowner knew about and consciously disregarded a serious risk, PC 452 could be in play. If the conduct was careless rather than reckless, Health and Safety Code 13001 and the civil liability rules in Health and Safety Code 13007 and 13009 may matter more than any arson statute.

Hypothetical 2: A car set on fire after an argument

After a breakup, a man pours gasoline on his former partner’s car parked on the street and lights it. A car is property, so the likely charge is arson of property under PC 451(d), a straight felony. Under the 2026 schedules above, that charge is listed at $50,000 in Los Angeles County and $25,000 in Santa Clara County, before any hearing or enhancement. If the car was parked beside a home and the fire spread to it, the case could move to PC 451(b), inhabited structure, and a much higher scheduled amount. Because the two were in a relationship, the court may also address protective orders; see our guide to bail for domestic violence.

Hypothetical 3: Paying someone else to set the fire

A business owner facing losses pays an acquaintance to burn an empty storage building he owns and collect the insurance. The owner never goes near the fire. Under PC 451, anyone who “aids, counsels, or procures the burning” is guilty of arson, so both people could face arson of a structure under 451(c). The owner’s own-property argument would not help: the 451(d) exception covers only personal property, and it does not apply when there is an intent to defraud. Penal Code 456 also allows a fine of twice the gross gain when the motive was financial.

Arson in California by the Numbers

The California Department of Justice publishes statewide arson figures each year in its Crime in California report. The 2025 edition, announced July 1, 2026, reports:

• 7,089 arson crimes reported by law enforcement agencies in 2025, down 4.5% from 7,421 in 2024 and down 39.7% from 11,759 in 2020.
• An arson rate of 17.9 per 100,000 Californians in 2025. The report says the rate “decreased 5.3% in 2025 (from 18.9 in 2024 to 17.9 in 2025).”
• 2,447 arson clearances in 2025, for a clearance rate of 34.5%. Clearances are a law enforcement measure, not court outcomes.
• 1,888 felony arson arrests in 2025, including 80 juveniles.
• By type of property, 4,157 arsons (58.6%) involved “other property” such as crops, timber and fences, 1,232 (17.4%) involved motor vehicles, and 1,585 (22.4%) involved structures, including 589 (8.3%) residential.

Two limits matter when reading these numbers. The report states: “Agencies must report arson only for fires determined through investigation to have been willfully or maliciously set.” It adds: “Attempts to burn are included in this offense, but fires of suspicious or unknown origins are not.” Fires of suspicious or unknown origin, and fires not found to be willfully or maliciously set, are therefore not in the count. The report also warns that 2023 figures were revised and should be compared with caution.

What Families Should Do

1. Find out where your loved one is and what they were booked for. Use the county jail’s inmate locator or our California inmate locator guide. Write down every code section on the booking record.
2. Look for the sections that change everything. Note whether the charge is PC 451, 451.5, 452, 453, 454 or 455, and whether any enhancement is listed. Aggravated arson, a state-of-emergency charge or an enhancement can change both the scheduled bail and the sentence range.
3. Check the county’s current bail schedule. Compare the booking amount with the schedule, and remember that a serious or violent felony flag means a judge must hold a hearing before release at a different amount or on own recognizance.
4. Get a criminal defense lawyer or the public defender involved early. Arson cases often turn on mental state and on how the fire started. Let the lawyer decide what to say to investigators, and avoid discussing the facts of the case with anyone else.
5. Gather information for the bail hearing. Courts consider community ties, work, a stable address, past court appearances and ability to post bond. Collect proof, such as a pay stub, a lease and letters from family, and give it to the lawyer.
6. Preserve records; do not alter anything. Keep photos, receipts, texts and other records that may matter and hand them to the lawyer. Do not delete, move or change anything connected to the fire.
7. If you think there is a warrant, deal with it directly. Arson investigations can take time. See our guide to posting bail on an outstanding warrant.
8. Understand what cosigning means before you sign. Read our guide to your role as a bail bond co-signer and our checklist of what you need to get a bail bond.
9. Track every court date. A missed date can lead to a warrant and a new charge. See what happens with a failure to appear.
10. Plan for what follows a conviction. Ask the lawyer about registration duties, restitution, custody credits and any immigration consequences. Our guide on how jail time is calculated in California explains credits.

How Bail Hotline Can Help

Everything above this section is written to be useful whether or not you ever call us. This is the one place we talk about ourselves.

Bail Hotline is a family-owned bail bond company that has served California families since 2004. We are licensed through our parent company, DMCG, Inc., with the California Department of Insurance (license #1845394). Reach us 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at (888) 958-1228.

High Bail on an Arson Charge? This Is Where We Help Most

Arson bail is often far higher than families expect. The 2026 schedules above run into six figures for common arson charges, and a serious or violent felony flag can mean waiting for a hearing before anything changes. Families are left wondering where their loved one is, what the booking sheet means, and whether anyone will take on a bond that size. That is exactly the moment we are built for.

• Large bonds are not an automatic no. A large, complicated or out-of-county bond is not an automatic no for us.
• Jail information quickly, at no charge. Our agents gather inmate information for all jails quickly and at no charge, and every Bail Hotline office holds accounts with the jail systems. We can help you learn where your loved one is held and what they were booked for.
• Ready the moment bail is set. Whether bail comes from the schedule, from a PC 1270.1 hearing or from the arraignment judge, our dedicated posting agents work around the clock, including nights, weekends and holidays.
• Warrant walk-throughs. Some people learn about an arson warrant weeks after a fire. If you think there is one, we walk you through the steps to address it.
• Every cosigner is walked through the agreement. Before anyone signs, an agent explains what the cosigner is agreeing to and answers questions.

Every case is different. A judge decides whether, when and on what terms someone charged with arson is released, and we cannot promise approval, a release time or any result in the case. If the court releases your loved one on their own recognizance, there may be nothing to post.

After Release: Keeping the Case on Track

• Text court-date reminders. We send text reminders of court dates, because a missed date in a felony case can bring a warrant and a new charge.
• Signing out of a bond. A cosigner may be able to sign out of a bond that is in good standing, meaning there are no past-due payments and the defendant has not missed court or daily online check-ins. We explain how it works case by case. See our guide to removing a cosigner’s name from a bail bond.
• If ICE detains someone who is out on bail, call us right away. The California court date still matters, and the defense lawyer should know the same day.

The services in this section concern California criminal bail. An immigration bond is posted with ICE under federal rules, and that is the work of our sister company, Liberty Immigration Bonds, which handles immigration bonds. Both companies are part of DMCG, Inc., and Liberty’s staff speak English and Spanish.

Find more offices in our locations directory, start online with online bail bonds, or read quick answers in our bail FAQ.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is arson a felony in California?

Yes. Every form of arson under Penal Code 451 is a felony, and so are aggravated arson under PC 451.5 and attempted arson under PC 455. Unlawfully causing a fire under PC 452 is different: it can be a felony or a misdemeanor when it injures someone or burns a home, structure or forest land, and it is a misdemeanor when it burns only other property.

How many years do you get for arson in California?

It depends on what burned and who was hurt. The ranges are 16 months, two or three years for arson of property; two, four or six years for a structure or forest land; three, five or eight years for an inhabited structure or property; and five, seven or nine years when someone suffers great bodily injury. Aggravated arson carries 10 years to life, and enhancements, a state-of-emergency charge or strike priors can add more.

What is the bail for arson in California?

It depends on the county and the exact charge. The 2026 schedules we checked list $50,000 to $250,000 for PC 451 charges in Los Angeles County, $50,000 to $250,000 for the PC 451 charges Orange County lists, and $25,000 to $100,000 in Santa Clara County. Los Angeles lists $500,000 for aggravated arson. Because arson is a serious felony, a judge must hold a hearing before releasing someone at a different amount or on their own recognizance.

Do you have to register as an arsonist in California?

Yes, after an arson or attempted arson conviction. Under Penal Code 457.1, anyone convicted of arson under PC 451, 451.5 or 453, or of attempted arson, on or after November 30, 1994, must register with local police or the sheriff for the rest of their life, within 14 days of moving into or changing a residence. A separate rule applies to some juvenile court cases. Unlawfully causing a fire under PC 452 does not trigger this registration.

Is arson a strike in California?

Yes. Arson is listed as a serious felony in Penal Code 1192.7(c)(14), and arson under PC 451(a) or (b) is also a violent felony under PC 667.5(c)(10). Serious and violent felony convictions count as strikes under the Three Strikes law, which can double a later felony sentence or, with two or more strikes, lead to a life term, subject to exceptions.

Can you be charged with arson for burning your own property?

Sometimes. PC 451(d) says arson of property does not include burning your own personal property, unless there is an intent to defraud or the fire injures another person or someone else’s structure, forest land or property. That exception covers only personal property, so it does not protect burning a structure or forest land. Burning your own things to collect insurance is not covered by the exception either.

What is the difference between arson and reckless burning?

Arson under PC 451 requires acting “willfully and maliciously,” meaning a deliberate act rather than an accident. Unlawfully causing a fire under PC 452, often called reckless burning, requires that the person was aware of and consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk of starting a fire. PC 452 carries lower sentences, can be a misdemeanor, and does not require arson registration.

Can a teenager be charged with arson in California?

Yes. In In re V.V. (2011), the California Supreme Court upheld arson findings against two 17-year-olds who threw a lit firecracker into dry brush, even though they did not intend to start a fire. Cases against minors begin in juvenile court, although for a teen who was 16 or older at the time, the prosecutor can ask the court to transfer a felony case to adult court under Welfare and Institutions Code 707. PC 457.1 sets a separate registration rule for some juvenile court cases. State figures show 80 of the 1,888 felony arson arrests in 2025 involved juveniles.

Can arson charges be reduced or dismissed?

Charges can change as a case develops. Prosecutors decide what to file, and a PC 452 charge can end as a misdemeanor, while PC 451 offenses are felonies. Juries can also acquit, as happened on the arson counts in the 2023 Holy Fire trial. What is possible in a specific case depends on the evidence and the lawyer’s work, and no one can promise a result.

Why We Publish This

Arson charges carry some of the heaviest consequences in California law: long prison terms, lifetime registration, a strike, and scheduled bail that can reach six figures. They also turn on subtle questions about intent that most families have never had to think about. We publish this guide so families can see the actual statutes, the dated 2026 bail schedules, real court outcomes and the state’s own data in plain English, and know what to ask before the first court date. This guide is general information, not legal advice. For advice about a specific case, talk to a California criminal defense lawyer or the public defender.

Sources and Further Reading

California statutes (official text)

• Penal Code 450 (arson definitions) and Penal Code 451 (arson)
• Penal Code 451.1 and Penal Code 452.1 (enhancements)
• Penal Code 451.5 (aggravated arson; version effective January 1, 2026, and the version operative January 1, 2029)
• Penal Code 452 (unlawfully causing a fire)
• Penal Code 453, Penal Code 454 and Penal Code 455 (incendiary materials, states of emergency, attempts)
• Penal Code 456, Penal Code 457 and Penal Code 457.1 (fines, evaluation, registration)
• Penal Code 667, Penal Code 667.5 and Penal Code 1192.7 (Three Strikes; violent and serious felony lists)
• Penal Code 825, Penal Code 1269b, Penal Code 1269c, Penal Code 1270.1, Penal Code 1275 and Penal Code 1319 (arraignment timing, bail schedules and release)
• Penal Code 1203, Penal Code 1202.4, Penal Code 1016.3, Penal Code 830.2 and Penal Code 19 (probation limits, restitution, immigration advice, CAL FIRE peace officers, misdemeanor punishment)
• Health and Safety Code 13001, 13007 and 13009 (careless fires, fire damage and suppression costs)
• Public Resources Code 4421 (setting fire to another’s land)
• Government Code 7282.5 and Government Code 7284.6 (California Values Act limits on ICE holds, notifications and transfers)
• Welfare and Institutions Code 707 (transfer of some juvenile cases to adult court)
• California Constitution, article I, section 12 and article I, section 28 (bail)

Court decisions and jury instructions

• People v. Atkins (2001) 25 Cal.4th 76, decided March 12, 2001
• In re V.V. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1020, decided June 6, 2011
• In re Humphrey (2021) 11 Cal.5th 135, decided March 25, 2021
• In re Kowalczyk (2026), decided April 30, 2026
• CALCRIM No. 1515, Arson (2026 edition)

County bail schedules (2026)

• Los Angeles County Superior Court, 2026 Felony Bail Schedule (effective January 1, 2026)
• Orange County Superior Court, 2026 Uniform Bail Schedule (effective January 1, 2026)
• Santa Clara County Superior Court, 2026 Criminal Bail Schedule (effective January 27, 2026)

Data

• California Department of Justice, Crime in California 2025 (published July 2026)

Federal law and cases

• 18 U.S.C. 844 (federal arson and explosives offenses)
• 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43) (aggravated felony definition), 8 U.S.C. 1226 and 8 U.S.C. 1227 (immigration detention and deportability)
• Luna Torres v. Lynch (2016) 578 U.S. 452, decided May 19, 2016
• U.S. Attorney’s Office, Central District of California: United States v. Jonathan Rinderknecht (case page updated August 21, 2026)

Reporting

• ABC7 Los Angeles, “Man acquitted of starting 2018 Holy Fire in Orange and Riverside Counties” (June 2, 2023)
• NBC Los Angeles, “Federal arson trial over Palisades wildfires ends in mistrial” (June 26, 2026)
• NBC Los Angeles, report on the superseding indictment and November retrial date (August 19, 2026)

California grand theft ordinarily means theft of property worth more than $950, under Penal Code 487. Exactly $950 is ordinarily on the petty-theft side of the line. That general rule needs qualifications: firearm theft has a separate rule, certain prior convictions can change punishment, and values from multiple thefts may sometimes be combined.

An ordinary grand-theft charge can receive misdemeanor or felony treatment. Grand theft of a firearm has a separate felony punishment provision. The charge appearing in a booking record also does not tell a family the final sentence, current bail amount or whether another hold prevents release.

This guide explains the offense, evidence, current punishment routes and practical custody questions. Its sentencing and bail sections concern adult criminal proceedings; juvenile court cases follow a different process. Law and sources checked October 1, 2026. A person’s attorney should apply those rules to the actual allegations and offense dates.

Contents

• Grand theft at a glance
• What the prosecution must prove
• How stolen property is valued
• When separate thefts can be combined
• Property exceptions and prior convictions
• Misdemeanor or felony treatment
• Possible sentences and financial consequences
• Grand theft compared with related charges
• What happens after a citation or arrest
• Bail and release questions
• Useful steps for a defendant or family
• Bail Hotline help with a grand-theft arrest
• Frequently asked questions
• Sources and further reading

Grand theft at a glance

The same statewide theft statutes apply across California. County courts use their own bail schedules and release procedures, which is why an offense definition and a local custody decision must be considered separately.

For the underlying theft definitions, read Penal Code 484, PC 487 and PC 490.2 together. The current Judicial Council instructions help explain how those statutes are presented to a jury.

What the prosecution must prove

The ordinary taking of another person’s property

For theft by larceny, CALCRIM 1800 identifies four basic issues. The prosecution must prove that the defendant took possession of property belonging to someone else, lacked the owner’s consent, had the required intent when taking it, and moved and kept it for at least a brief period. The prosecution bears the burden of proving the crime beyond reasonable doubt.

The required intent includes intending permanent deprivation, or intending a deprivation long enough to take away a major part of the property’s value or enjoyment. Describing this only as an intention to keep an item forever leaves out part of the instruction. On the other hand, an accusation that someone possessed an expensive item does not by itself establish every element.

Movement can be short, and possession can be brief. A family should therefore avoid assuming that an item had to leave a building, be sold or remain missing for days before a taking could qualify. The attorney needs the sequence of events, including when possession began, what permission existed and what the person intended at that point.

Useful questions include who owned or possessed the item, who could authorize its use, what authorization was actually given and whether that authorization had limits. A borrowed tool, a disputed purchase and an item secretly taken from a stranger present different evidence. A label such as “borrowed” or “stolen” is a conclusion to investigate, not a substitute for the facts.

Different theft methods can require different proof

PC 484 groups more than one form of theft under California’s theft law. Besides an unauthorized taking, it addresses fraudulent appropriation of entrusted property and specified ways of obtaining property through fraud. A PC 487 allegation may therefore arise from an employee’s handling of entrusted money or a fraudulent transaction, rather than someone physically grabbing merchandise.

The method matters. Whether the owner transferred possession, transferred ownership, entrusted property for a limited purpose or agreed because of a false representation can affect the required proof. The larceny list above should not be treated as the complete instruction for every fraud or embezzlement allegation.

Ask counsel to identify the charged theft theory before assembling a response. For a transaction, preserve the agreement and communications. For entrusted funds, preserve authorization and accounting records. For an alleged physical taking, preserve the timeline and any relevant location or surveillance information. Give counsel complete records, including material that seems unfavorable; selective screenshots can hide the context that explains an event.

Theft must be proved before its degree is decided

The question whether theft occurred comes before the separate question whether it was grand theft. CALCRIM 1801 assigns the prosecution the burden of establishing grand rather than lesser theft beyond reasonable doubt.

A disagreement over price may be important even when the taking is not disputed. Conversely, proving a high price does not eliminate a dispute over identity, consent or intent. Those issues belong in separate parts of the attorney’s analysis. A defendant should not assume that contesting value requires conceding the rest of the accusation.

How stolen property is valued

Fair market value at the relevant time and place

The ordinary property-value test concerns fair market value at the time and place of the theft. That focuses the inquiry on the actual item and relevant market, rather than automatically using sentimental value, the cost of a new replacement or a price remembered from years earlier.

Condition can matter. A used laptop with damage and an older model may have a different market value from its new retail price. The useful evidence might include its model, specifications, age, condition photographs and comparable market information from the relevant period. The point is to help counsel examine a realistic valuation, not to invent a low figure after an arrest.

Retail merchandise also requires context. An advertised price or receipt may support value, but disputes can arise about the product identified, genuine discounts, the relevant market or the number of items included. Services and labor have their own valuation language in PC 484, including contract price or reasonable going wage when no contract price exists; a property resale calculation should not simply be substituted for that rule.

An owner’s estimate is evidence, not the final answer

CALCRIM 1860 allows the jury to consider an owner’s opinion about value. The instruction also leaves the weight of that opinion to the jury. Ownership does not make every estimate conclusive, and a defense estimate does not automatically prevail because it is lower.

The published decision People v. Pena, 68 Cal.App.3d 100, decided March 15, 1977, involved differing market-value evidence for two leather jackets. The court explained why one store’s lower selling price did not necessarily settle the relevant retail market and why the jury could assess the valuation witnesses. The judgment was affirmed. Its useful lesson here is about market evidence and evidentiary weight, not its historical dollar threshold.

Near the boundary, details can change the charge

Consider an invented example: an accusation concerns a used device bought for $1,300 several years earlier. If credible evidence establishes its relevant market value at $900, the original purchase price alone does not resolve the current theft degree. The attorney must still examine the actual property, applicable exceptions and any aggregation allegation.

In another invented example, several items are alleged to have been taken together. An itemized total and support for each value matter more than a rounded estimate. Ask whether the accusation includes property not actually taken, duplicates an item or uses a new-item price for used property. These are evidence questions for counsel, not instructions to alter receipts or contact witnesses about their testimony.

Keep valuation records in their original form. Note the source and date of a comparable listing, and distinguish an asking price from an actual sale if known. A collection of undated screenshots with no item details can be difficult to evaluate. Counsel can decide what is relevant, admissible and worth pursuing.

When separate thefts can be combined

The current aggregation statute has its own rule

Penal Code 490.3, added through Proposition 36 and effective December 18, 2024, permits values from one or more theft or shoplifting acts to be aggregated in a single count or charge when determining the degree of theft. Its text does not impose an express common-plan, same-victim or 90-day condition.

That matters when a family looks at each alleged transaction separately. Individually smaller values do not establish that a case must remain petty theft. The relevant inquiry is which aggregation authority is charged, what acts it covers and whether those acts and values can be proved. Current CALCRIM 1801 includes a total-value alternative reflecting PC 490.3.

PC 487(e) describes a related-acts route

PC 487(e) separately addresses distinct but related acts motivated by one intention, general impulse and plan. It allows the specified values to be combined, including acts involving multiple victims or other counties. The statute lists a 90-day period among possible evidence of the required relationship; it is not an exclusive time limit.

These two provisions should not be collapsed into one rule. CALCRIM 1802 addresses the overall-plan route, while current 1801 also includes the newer total-value alternative. It would be misleading to require proof of a common plan for every aggregation under today’s statutes.

For a case involving several incidents, make a factual list for counsel: alleged dates, locations, property, amounts, supporting records and which allegations are disputed. Include the offense dates because the applicable version of a law may matter. Do not combine incidents yourself and announce a legal total. Charging rules, proof and applicable law need the attorney’s review.

PC 487(b)(3) also addresses takings from an employer by a servant, agent or employee over 12 consecutive months. Counsel should read that employer-specific provision with PC 490.2 and any other aggregation allegation. Looking at each payment separately does not decide the degree of an entrusted-funds case.

Property exceptions and prior convictions

Older property lists need the current petty-theft qualification

PC 487 still lists taking property from a person, automobile theft and specified agricultural or aquaculture categories. Reading only that list can produce an outdated answer for lower-value property. PC 490.2 generally overrides grand-theft definitions for covered theft at $950 or less, and current CALCRIM 1801 applies an above-$950 qualification to its person, automobile and listed farm-product alternatives.

For example, an accusation involving a wallet taken from a person needs review of the proved value and applicable statutes. It should not automatically be described as grand theft regardless of value. If force or fear is alleged, a separate robbery question may arise and needs its own analysis.

Firearm theft has a separate rule

PC 490.2 expressly excludes firearm theft from its ordinary low-value treatment. PC 487 lists firearms, and PC 489(a) supplies a separate state-prison punishment. A family should not assume that a firearm’s low resale value creates the ordinary misdemeanor alternative.

Other firearm charges may also appear in the record. Identify the exact filed sections and allegations rather than treating the phrase “grand theft firearm” as the entire case. This guide’s base sentencing comparison does not calculate additional offenses or enhancements.

A prior record must be read precisely

The prior-conviction exception in PC 490.2 references specified offenses in PC 667(e)(2)(C)(iv), or an offense requiring registration under PC 290(c). It does not mean that every prior felony eliminates ordinary low-value treatment. Its alternative punishment language also should not be casually relabeled as an ordinary above-threshold PC 487 case.

Separate prior-theft statutes can create different allegations. The detailed California petty theft with a prior guide explains PC 666 and PC 666.1. For the current case, counsel should check the exact prior allegation and underlying record. A family recollection of an old arrest may differ from the conviction, its disposition or what the prosecutor has actually charged.

Misdemeanor or felony treatment

Ordinary grand theft is commonly called a “wobbler” because its punishment provision permits misdemeanor or felony treatment. PC 489(c)(1) states those alternatives. PC 17 supplies classification rules and circumstances in which a qualifying offense becomes a misdemeanor.

The word “wobbler” describes legal alternatives. It is not a promise that the prosecutor will file a misdemeanor, that the judge will reduce a filed felony or that paying restitution guarantees reduction. The defendant’s actual charge and procedural record control what must happen next.

Read the complaint or other charging document when available. A booking description may be abbreviated, may show an initial arrest theory or may omit an enhancement. It can be useful for locating custody information without being the final statement of the case.

An attorney can explain the existing classification, possible reduction and the consequences of different resolutions. Keep any court order changing classification with the case records. A later change should be confirmed in the actual court record, rather than assumed from an informal description of a hearing.

Possible sentences and financial consequences

Base custody ranges

The following are base punishment routes, checked against the current statutes. They do not calculate a sentence with multiple counts, enhancements or every prior-record consequence.

PC 18.5(a) applies the 364-day maximum to covered statutes prescribing county jail up to one year. It does not turn the felony terms in PC 1170(h) into a 364-day maximum. The location and length of a felony sentence must be read under that separate provision.

PC 1170(h)(3) contains state-prison exceptions involving specified serious or violent convictions, registration requirements and a specified enhancement. Subsection (h)(4) preserves other authorized dispositions. An ordinary felony range therefore does not prove that every defendant must serve that entire period in state prison or in physical custody.

Large-loss allegations can add to the base sentence

Separate PC 12022.6 loss or property-value enhancements may add consecutive imprisonment in a qualifying felony case. The current official site displays both the Proposition 36 provision and the 2024 legislative provision. Their amount-related facts must be charged and admitted or found true as specified; an estimate mentioned in a conversation is not itself an imposed enhancement.

The practical question is whether an enhancement appears in the actual charging document and which law applies to the offense dates. Counsel should calculate the complete potential exposure. The ordinary three-year upper base term should not be presented as a universal cap for a case containing additional allegations.

Fines, restitution and bail answer different questions

A criminal fine is part of punishment. Victim restitution concerns losses caused by the crime and is governed by its own rules, including PC 1202.4. Bail concerns release while a case is pending. These amounts should not be added together and described as one grand-theft “price.”

The market value used to decide theft degree is also a different inquiry from the full loss calculation for restitution. Recovered property, claimed economic losses and supporting documents can require review. Keep recovery receipts and any compensation records, and let counsel handle how they are presented.

Avoid private promises that repayment will make the criminal case disappear. A victim’s wishes can matter without controlling the prosecutor or court. Any restitution arrangement should be discussed with counsel, particularly when contact restrictions or protective orders apply. The California Courts sentencing overview explains how sentencing follows a conviction or plea and may include custody, probation and financial obligations.

Grand theft compared with related charges

Grand theft concerns a theft theory and its degree. Robbery has an additional force-or-fear component under PC 211. A sudden taking and a taking accompanied by force or fear may therefore raise different charging questions. The attorney should read the facts and alleged sections rather than rely on an everyday label such as “mugging.”

PC 459.5 defines the shoplifting offense through specified entry, intent, business-hours and value requirements. Shoplifting and grand theft are not interchangeable labels for every store incident. Current aggregation can also affect a case involving more than one alleged shoplifting act.

Vehicle, entrusted-money and fraud cases may involve additional statutes. A family does not need to master each separate offense before seeking help. It does need an accurate list of the charged sections, alleged enhancements and current court information. That list prevents a general PC 487 explanation from being mistaken for a complete analysis of a more complicated case.

What happens after a citation or arrest

A citation still requires attention

Some defendants receive a citation or notice to appear rather than remaining in custody. Read its date, court location and instructions carefully. Being out of jail does not mean the accusation is dismissed or that a court date can be skipped.

Keep the notice and arrange legal advice promptly. Ask counsel how to confirm the case number and current calendar if a date or charge is unclear. A family should not infer a new deadline from another person’s case, a search result or an old bail table.

Booking and filing are separate stages

If arrested, the person’s custody record may contain a booking number, listed charge, location and tentative release information. The prosecutor’s filing decision and court proceedings are separate stages. The California Courts explanation of charges being filed describes the early criminal-case process.

Confirm the current facility rather than arranging a pickup from an old arrest location. Ask whether there has been a transfer, whether all holds are shown and whether the listed bail information is current. Record when the information was checked because custody details can change.

Arraignment establishes important next steps

At arraignment, the defendant learns the filed charges and rights, responds to the charges and receives further court dates. An eligible person who cannot afford counsel can ask about appointed representation. The judge also addresses custody and release conditions when the defendant remains in jail.

The family can help by preserving paperwork, arranging practical support and keeping track of confirmed dates. Decisions about pleas, waiving time or challenging evidence belong in the defendant’s discussion with counsel. A fast resolution is not automatically the best resolution, especially when consequences beyond custody need review.

Bail and release questions

Find the current authority for the amount

PC 1269b distinguishes amounts fixed by a warrant, county schedule and judicial order. Once the defendant has appeared before a judge on the charge, the amount set by the judge matters. Courts must maintain county schedules, but a schedule entry is not the full case record.

Use the California bail amounts by crime and county guide for county lookup and schedule context. Then confirm the actual amount and release status for the person. Additional charges, enhancing allegations or court orders may affect the answer.

Release may involve conditions beyond money

The arraignment guide describes release on a promise to return, supervised release, bail and circumstances in which custody continues. A PC 487 label alone does not establish which option applies. Counsel can raise case-specific release questions before the court.

Ask what conditions accompany release: court appearances, supervision, restrictions or a protective order if one is issued. A person who is released still must comply with the actual order. Keep a copy and seek clarification through counsel if an instruction is unclear.

Posting on one case does not clear every hold

PC 1269b describes discharge as to the offense on which bail is posted. A separate warrant, case or hold may still affect release. Confirm all custody grounds before planning transportation or treating one posted bond as a complete release guarantee.

Release timing also depends on the facility’s processing and verification. Ask for current information and make a practical pickup plan, but do not treat an estimate as a guaranteed hour. A bonding agreement, a jail’s acceptance of the bond and the person’s physical release are distinct steps worth confirming.

Useful steps for a defendant or family

1. Gather the case identifiers. Keep the full legal name, booking number if available, current facility, case number, charged sections and confirmed next court date together. Date any custody or bail information you record.
2. Arrange counsel. Tell counsel about the actual allegation and offense dates. Ask whether the case involves larceny, entrusted property, fraud, aggregated acts, a firearm or a qualifying prior. Bring the papers rather than relying on memory.
3. Preserve relevant evidence. Keep original messages, agreements, receipts, account statements, photographs and valuation records. Tell counsel about surveillance that may exist so counsel can consider preservation before it is overwritten. Do not alter or delete material.
4. Use lawful communication. Give evidence and witness information to counsel. Do not coach testimony, pressure a complainant or make repayment conditional on changing an account. Follow any contact restrictions or protective order.
5. Separate legal and practical decisions. Counsel handles charge, plea, evidence and court questions. The family can organize transportation, work or caregiving needs, reminders and any bond agreement without negotiating the criminal case itself.
6. Track the next obligation after release. Confirm the actual court calendar and release conditions. A bond or reminder does not replace the defendant’s responsibility to appear and comply.

This preparation helps with a misdemeanor case as well as a felony case. An organized record can expose a mistaken amount, missing authorization or wrong case identifier sooner, while giving counsel the full information needed to assess it.

Bail Hotline help with a grand-theft arrest

Everything above this section is written to be useful whether or not you ever call us. This is the one place we talk about ourselves.

Bail Hotline is a family-owned company serving California since 2004. DMCG Inc. operates under California Department of Insurance license 1845394. Our team is available 24/7 at (888) 958-1228 to help a family work through the custody and bond steps after a grand-theft arrest.

We can help locate available jail information without requiring a bond purchase, including for someone who is not a client. Start with the person’s name, booking details if available and the county or facility involved. We can help the family identify what is known and what still needs confirmation before a bond decision.

When a bond is authorized and appropriate, our dedicated posting team works around the clock. Large amounts, complex cases and cases outside the family’s home county are not automatic reasons to stop asking about available help. We can discuss remote arrangements, approved payment plans and contributions from more than one person, based on the agreement and case.

Each cosigner is walked through the agreement and responsibilities before signing. Ask about the required payments, any collateral terms and continuing obligations, and keep the documents. Clients also receive court-date text reminders as practical support alongside their confirmed court information.

If an outstanding warrant is part of the situation, the team can help walk through available bond-side steps alongside counsel where appropriate. Every case is different, and the judge makes the final decision. The jail confirms its custody grounds and processes release; no legal outcome or exact release time is guaranteed.

These direct office pages offer local starting points. For another area, use our California office directory.

Frequently asked questions

Is theft of exactly $950 grand theft?

Ordinarily, the general threshold is above $950, while PC 490.2 covers $950 or less. Firearms, specified prior-conviction punishment rules and applicable aggregation require separate attention. Do not use a rounded amount in a booking description as the final valuation.

Does grand theft always carry a felony sentence?

Ordinary grand theft permits misdemeanor or felony treatment under PC 489(c)(1). Firearm grand theft has a separate felony punishment provision. The filed charge, any classification order and additional allegations must be checked.

Does taking a wallet from someone automatically make low-value theft grand theft?

Read PC 487 with PC 490.2 and current CALCRIM 1801. The older taking-from-person wording does not remove the current ordinary value qualification for covered theft. Any alleged force or fear also raises a separate robbery question.

Can several smaller thefts become one grand-theft charge?

They may. Current PC 490.3 allows aggregation in determining theft degree; PC 487(e) separately describes a related-acts route. Counsel should check the authority, alleged acts, values and offense dates instead of assuming every aggregation requires the same conditions.

If the property comes back, is the case automatically dismissed?

No. A completed taking with the required intent can remain a theft even if property is later recovered. Recovery and compensation may matter to evidence, restitution or case resolution, but they do not guarantee dismissal.

Can the victim decide to drop the charge?

A victim’s wishes do not alone determine a prosecutor’s filing decision or a court’s outcome. Discuss any communication or proposed restitution with counsel, and comply with any contact restriction. Do not pressure a person to change evidence or testimony.

Is the ordinary misdemeanor maximum one year?

For ordinary grand theft, the covered one-year county-jail language in PC 489 is capped at 364 days by PC 18.5(a). That cap does not replace the separate felony terms under PC 1170(h).

How much is bail for a PC 487 arrest?

Confirm the actual county, all charges and any warrant or judicial order. The county schedule may provide a starting amount, but it does not establish every defendant’s current release status. The linked statewide bail guide supplies county lookup context.

What should a family confirm before arranging a bond?

Confirm the person’s current facility, booking details, release eligibility, current amount and all separate holds. Then review the actual agreement and cosigner responsibilities. Counsel can address disputed allegations and court release questions.

Does being released mean the grand-theft case is finished?

No. Release concerns custody while the case proceeds. The defendant must follow the court’s calendar and conditions, maintain communication with counsel and obtain the actual disposition before treating the case as resolved.

Sources and further reading

The current statutory text and Judicial Council instructions support the legal explanations above. Instruction numbers have their own revision dates within the March 2026 CALCRIM edition. The dated Pena opinion is used only for its valuation lesson.

• California Legislature: PC 484, PC 487, PC 488, PC 489, PC 490.2 and PC 490.3.
• Classification and punishment: PC 17, PC 18.5, PC 1170, PC 12022.6 and PC 1202.4.
• Judicial Council: CALCRIM 2026, particularly instructions 1800, 1801, 1802 and 1860.
• Published opinion: People v. Pena, 68 Cal.App.3d 100, pages 102-104, March 15, 1977.
• Court process: charges filed, arraignment, sentencing and PC 1269b.

Quick answer: Confirm which provision appears in the court record. Penal Code 1275 addresses factors used to set, reduce or deny bail. A source-of-bail inquiry is governed by Penal Code 1275.1. After a judge or magistrate determines that the required probable cause exists, the defendant bears the burden of showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that no part of the proposed bail consideration was feloniously obtained. Prepare the actual funding information with counsel and follow the court’s order, rather than assuming a particular document or payment will remove the hold.

Updated September 30, 2026. This guide explains California’s hearing and lawful-source preparation task. It covers the controlling statutory distinctions, court process and practical questions for families. The actual case, current order and applicable local procedure govern a particular matter.

In this guide: Which code applies | Source-hold findings | Hearing preparation | Records questions | Loans and privacy | After the hearing | Bail Hotline help | FAQ

PC 1275 and PC 1275.1 Address Different Questions

The phrase PC 1275 hearing can leave a family unsure what the court is reviewing. Start with the specific statute, request and order. An ordinary question about the amount of bail and a concern about where the proposed money or property came from are different legal tasks.

PC 1275 directs the court to consider public protection, seriousness of the charged offense, prior criminal record and likelihood of appearing at trial or a hearing. Public safety is the primary consideration. The statute also contains specific seriousness, controlled-substance and below-schedule reduction provisions.

Those factors do not form a universal source-of-funds document checklist. Broader bail-setting law and constitutional requirements also matter. Our California bail-rules overview explains that wider framework, and the bail-amounts guide covers the separate amounts question. This article focuses on the source inquiry and hearing preparation.

Identify the actual restriction before arranging payment

Ask whether there is a pending request to restrict the source of bail, a judicial holding order, a different bail issue or another matter affecting release. Obtain the case or booking reference and the current order through the appropriate agency, court or lawyer.

A displayed bail amount does not establish that the funds can be accepted immediately. Conversely, an unfamiliar notation does not tell the family everything about the underlying request. Record the information, its source and the time it was obtained so counsel can reconcile it with the court file.

What the Court Must Find in a Source-of-Bail Inquiry

PC 1275.1 reaches more than cash handed directly to a jail. Its language covers consideration, pledges, security, deposits and indemnification paid, given, made or promised for bail execution. A bond arrangement can therefore raise source questions about a premium payment, collateral or other relevant promised consideration.

The statute defines feloniously obtained in terms of possession, receipt or acquisition through an unlawful act, transaction or occurrence constituting a felony. The inquiry is not merely whether the family has enough money. Nor does the name of a charge, lack of employment or a high bail amount alone replace the required statutory findings.

A judicial hold requires the specified probable-cause basis

Under subdivision (b), the hold on release is ordered by a magistrate or judge. The statute identifies three ways the issue can arise: a peace officer’s declaration under penalty of perjury setting out probable cause, a prosecutor’s such declaration, or the magistrate or judge’s own probable cause to believe the source was felonious.

Keep the person raising the concern separate from the person making the judicial determination. A bail agent does not independently remove the court’s holding order. A family should ask what was submitted and what the magistrate or judge actually decided.

The defendant’s burden follows the court’s finding

Subdivision (c) places the burden on the defendant once the court determines that probable cause exists under subdivision (b). The standard is a preponderance of the evidence. The Madera Superior Court glossary explains the term through the weight of evidence and whether something is more likely to have occurred than not.

That standard describes how a fact is proved. The fact required by this statute is that no part of the relevant bail consideration was obtained by felonious means. It is not enough to treat only most of the money as lawful, and a stack of documents is not automatically sufficient just because it is large.

The source inquiry is distinct from deciding guilt on the criminal charge. A source-related holding order is not itself a conviction, and removal of that order does not dismiss the charge. Keep the bail question and the criminal defense in their proper roles.

How to Prepare for the Actual Hearing

Preparation starts with the court’s concern and the proposed bail transaction. A generic promise that an agency can clear every hold with the same paperwork gives the family too little information about the issue that must be proved.

Obtain and understand the relevant declaration and order

PC 1275.1(d) provides for the defendant and attorney to receive a copy of the probable-cause declaration filed under subdivision (b), no later than the date the provision incorporates from PC 825. Counsel can determine the applicable chronology and whether the required material was provided.

Ask what money, property, transfer or promised consideration is questioned. Identify whether the concern involves the defendant’s resources, a contributor’s resources, a lender, collateral or another part of the arrangement. That information helps counsel decide which evidence is relevant and what legal response is available.

Confirm the hearing procedure in the actual court

Court-specific rules can address how a request is calendared, which declaration or offer of proof accompanies it, notice and service, and who must attend. Our general California bail-hearing preparation guide covers the broader appearance task. For a source hearing, check the specific order and local requirements with counsel.

Two official examples show why forms should not be generalized across counties:

The Trinity local-rule resource expressly states that its local rules apply only in that county. The rules PDF describes the source-hearing procedure. The LA form is a separate example of how the initiating request and decision are recorded. Read the actual form’s purpose before treating it as something the defendant should file.

Identify the real providers and the full proposed arrangement

List who will pay, lend, pledge property or make another relevant promise. Distinguish a premium payment from a deposit with the court, and collateral from an amount actually paid. If several people contribute, the arrangement needs to be described accurately rather than presented as one person’s money without explanation.

The statute places the burden on the defendant; it does not create a separate identical legal burden for every cosigner. However, a contributor’s information or testimony may be important to the defendant’s showing. Counsel can identify what is needed from each person and how it should be presented.

Prepare the people whose evidence may matter

Ask counsel whether the payer, lender, property owner, bail agent or another witness needs to appear or provide a declaration. Trinity’s local source-hearing rule, for example, provides for examination and cross-examination of specified participants. That is a local procedural example, rather than a statement that every California hearing uses exactly the same witnesses.

People should be ready to explain what they personally know about the proposed source and transaction. Identify gaps or uncertainty so counsel can address them. Do not fill a gap with an invented account of how money was earned or transferred.

What Supporting Records May Help Answer

PC 1275.1 does not prescribe a universal number of pay stubs, months of bank statements or tax returns for every source inquiry. The relevant evidence depends on the source concern, the proposed consideration and the actual court’s procedure. Records should be lawfully available and accurately connected to the issue counsel is addressing.

These are examples for discussion, not a promise that the court will request or accept every listed item. A lawful source might involve wages, retirement income, legitimate business proceeds, a gift, a loan or property. There is no employment-only shortcut in the statute’s definition.

Connect the evidence to the proposed consideration

Help counsel match the records to the actual payment, pledge or promise being proposed. A document showing income may address one question, while another record explains a transfer or ownership. The purpose is to present an accurate account of the relevant source, not to collect unrelated financial material simply to make a larger packet.

If a record is incomplete or cannot be obtained promptly through lawful access, tell counsel what is known and what is unavailable. Ask what other legitimate evidence or procedure may address the issue. The missing record does not justify altering a document or concealing the real contributor.

Keep versions and explanations consistent

Keep genuine copies organized with clear dates and descriptions. Identify which record supports which part of the transaction, and distinguish an existing payment from a future promise. If the proposed funding arrangement changes, tell counsel and the agent so they can assess what requires further explanation or court approval.

Do not assume that approval of one proposed source automatically extends to a materially different payer, loan or pledge. The court’s finding and any condition should be read against the actual arrangement being used.

Loans, Financial Privacy and Accurate Information

A lawful loan is expressly contemplated

PC 1275.1(e) states that the section does not prohibit a loan so long as it will be funded and repaid with funds not feloniously obtained. Both parts matter. A genuine loan document can help describe the arrangement, but the label loan is not an exemption from a source inquiry.

Discuss the real lender, funding and repayment plan with counsel. A family should not treat a loan, credit arrangement or contributor as a way to disguise the origin of money. The proposal and evidence need to reflect what will actually occur.

Financial privacy has a specific hearing provision

Under subdivision (f), a person providing any portion of the relevant bail consideration may request that the magistrate or judge close the source evidentiary hearing to the general public to protect financial privacy. The statute says the court may do so; closure is not automatic.

That hearing provision does not itself mean every filed financial record is sealed or that relevant facts can be withheld from the court. Ask counsel about permitted redactions, submission methods and any appropriate privacy request before filing sensitive material. Obtain records through lawful access and the provider’s authorization where required.

Willful source misrepresentation can affect bail

Subdivision (i) permits bail to be increased when the defendant is found to have willfully misled the court about the source. The misrepresentation may also be considered at a later bail hearing. Accuracy is therefore part of preparation, rather than a formatting detail.

Make corrections and unresolved questions known to counsel. A clear statement of what a witness knows, supported by genuine records, is more useful than an account tailored to a desired outcome. The hearing should address the actual statutory concern and proposed transaction.

What the Order Means After the Hearing

When the defendant meets the burden under subdivision (c), the statute directs the court to release the previously ordered source hold and provides for release under the authorized bail amount. For a qualifying surety-bond release, subdivision (j) addresses vacating the holding order on the condition that the court approves the bond consideration.

Keep court approval of the source and consideration separate from approval of the agency’s contract or underwriting terms. Ask what the order covers, which transaction was approved, whether the authorized bail requirements are satisfied and whether a separate matter remains.

Get the actual decision and next instructions

Obtain the order or reliable court-status information through counsel and the appropriate agency. Confirm that the responsible facility received the necessary authorization and ask what processing or other lawful requirements remain. Removal of one source hold is not dismissal of the criminal case or a waiver of future appearances.

If a source question remains unresolved, counsel can explain what the court decided and what lawful next step may be available. A company advertisement or a generic document packet cannot replace that decision.

Timing questions require the record

Subdivision (g) addresses a specific situation: a declaration filed with a magistrate or judge has not been acted on within 24 hours, and release is conditioned on posting the set bail. This is not a universal promise of physical release 24 hours after arrest, booking, hiring an agent or collecting documents.

Counsel should establish when the relevant declaration was filed, whether the magistrate or judge acted on it, what amount is authorized and what other matter affects custody. An already-acted-on declaration and a pending source showing are different facts from the subsection’s not-acted-on condition. No general hearing or pickup clock follows from the shorthand PC 1275 hold.

How Bail Hotline Can Help

Everything above this section is written to be useful whether or not you ever call us. This is the one place we talk about ourselves.

Bail Hotline is family-owned and has served families since 2004 through DMCG, Inc., California Department of Insurance license 1845394. Our team is available 24/7 at (888) 958-1228 for bail information and assistance.

Understand the actual bond proposal alongside counsel

We provide free assistance searching available inmate, warrant, court and bail information, along with bail guidance, without an obligation to purchase a bond. Tell us the information you have so we can help identify the available facts and next step. Our About page explains those services.

When a bond is an available route, our agents can explain the actual proposed agreement, payment arrangement and responsibilities, and coordinate relevant bond information within our role. Counsel addresses the legal hearing and presentation of evidence; the court decides the source issue and its order. A large, complicated or out-of-county bond is not an automatic no, and we work from the actual situation and applicable approvals.

Coordinate an approved arrangement and continuing support

We walk cosigners through agreements and explain the actual premium, approved starting payment, remaining balance, schedule and responsibilities. Payment plans are available on approved bonds, and multiple people can contribute as coordinated for the transaction. Supported paperwork can be completed by phone and online.

Dedicated posting agents are available around the clock. Court authorization, the approved bond arrangement and the jail’s processing still need to be addressed. Continuing support includes court-date text reminders, conditional warrant walk-through assistance and bond-related guidance. American Locator and Recovery is a trusted separate partner when recovery assistance is relevant.

Every case is different. We help families understand the available information and services without claiming that a particular document, loan, agency declaration or payment guarantees hold removal or a release time. Honest mistakes and intentional noncompliance can raise different issues; our role is to work through the actual facts and approved arrangement.

Our locations directory lists additional offices, and the bail FAQ answers other common process questions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is PC 1275 the same as PC 1275.1?

They address different questions. Section 1275 lists bail-setting factors and specified additional provisions. Section 1275.1 governs the source-of-bail inquiry, its holding-order triggers and the required lawful-source showing. Check the actual code and order.

Can an officer or prosecutor personally remove the judicial source hold?

The statute identifies officer and prosecutor declarations as possible grounds for the magistrate or judge to order the hold. The judicial findings and resulting order govern its removal. Ask what request and decision are recorded rather than relying on a general assurance.

Who bears the proof burden at the source hearing?

Once the court determines probable cause exists under subdivision (b), subdivision (c) places the preponderance burden on the defendant. Information from payers, lenders, property owners or other witnesses may support that showing, but the statute does not assign an identical separate defendant burden to every cosigner.

Does a pay stub or a fixed number of bank statements always suffice?

There is no universal record quantity in PC 1275.1. The evidence must address the actual source concern and proposed consideration under the governing procedure. Discuss appropriate, genuinely available records with counsel.

Can a legitimate loan be used?

Subdivision (e) contemplates a loan funded and repaid with funds not feloniously obtained. Show the real arrangement and relevant evidence; obtaining a loan does not automatically remove a source hold.

Can the hearing protect a contributor’s financial privacy?

Subdivision (f) permits a qualifying provider to request closure of the source evidentiary hearing to the general public. The court decides the request. Ask counsel separately about record submission, redactions or sealing rather than assuming all material becomes confidential.

Must every application be made through privately retained counsel?

Subdivision (h) preserves applications by the defendant personally or through the specified attorney, licensed bail agent, admitted surety insurer, friend or family member. The actual local procedure and legal issues still need attention. Do not treat a private-attorney purchase or an advertised rate as a statutory condition of making an application.

Does a cleared source hold mean the charges were dropped?

The source determination and criminal case are separate. A favorable source finding addresses the relevant hold and authorized bail arrangement, while court appearances, other orders and the underlying prosecution require their own attention.

Is release guaranteed immediately after the hearing?

Read the actual order, authorized bail requirements and any court-approved bond consideration. Confirm other matters and facility processing. Neither a generic document list nor the hearing’s conclusion supplies a reliable pickup time for every case.

Why We Publish This

Families need to know which issue the court is deciding and what evidence and instructions apply. This guide explains the source-hearing framework without treating suspicion as a finding, a checklist as proof, or a bond company’s role as the court’s authority. It provides general information; counsel, applicable law and actual orders govern an individual case.

Sources and Further Reading

Sources checked September 30, 2026. The current official code text was read in full. Local materials below are labeled examples, with their actual editions and purposes, rather than universal statewide forms or requirements.

• California Penal Code 1275 and 1275.1.
• Madera Superior Court legal glossary, for the general meaning of preponderance of evidence.
• Trinity Superior Court local-rule resource and currently linked July 1, 2021 rules, source-of-bail procedure on page 22.
• Los Angeles court Bail resources and CRIM 205 request form, revised September 2026.